With the new healthcare buildings, a large number of old care buildings will be demolished or modified for new use. What kind of architecture and building heritage will we lose in the process?
The projects introduced in the Care issue, along with many similar undertakings in our country, are resulting in a large number of health care buildings being torn down or converted into new uses. What is being lost in the process is not only tons of concrete and steel, but also indisputable cultural and historical values – not to mention the memories that are embedded in the walls and wards of these life-saving buildings.
At the greatest peril are care buildings from the 1960s and 1970s, which made health care services accessible to all citizens. Even though they mostly represent everyday utilitarian construction, they were also frequently featured in their time on the pages of the Finnish Architectural Review. Present-day decision makers seem to view the buildings as little more than problem properties plagued by indoor air issues and low floor heights – nuisances that can be wiped out without objections.
A different problem is being faced by buildings located in more remote areas, which are being vacated as newly established wellbeing services counties centralise their operations. A number of former hospitals and sanatoriums have already been converted into housing, care homes or rehabilitation centres, while others have been left to deteriorate unoccupied. In addition, many care buildings have been given a temporary lease of life as refugee centres. ↙
The research-based colour design is weakly known in Finland. Colour researcher Saara Pyykkö shares her insights on what an architect should know about colour.
The ever-worsening climate crisis places the built environment at the center of politics and ecological reconstruction of society, where architecture plays a central role. The question remains, what the architecture of ecological reconstruction should be like?